Legal Opinion

Bernes v. Weisser

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 15, 1852PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

The assets of the intestate being insufficient for the payment of all his debts in full, Carl Bernes, one of the creditors, presents a demand for which he claims priority. The intestate, in the month of January, 1849, signed a stipulation in admiralty in a cause wherein Bernes was libellant. On the sixth of the succeeding June, a decretal order of reference was made to ascertain and compute the amount due the libellant; on the 29th of December the Commissioner reported, and on the 2d of January, 1850, a final decree was entered, and judgment was also recovered against the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manhattan Co. v. EvertsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  2. Nichols v. ChapmanNew York Supreme Court · 1832

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re DunnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1879
  2. Second National Bank v. BlauveltNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1888
  3. In re ClarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API