Legal Opinion

McRae v. . Commissioners of New Hanover

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was a MOTION in the cause heard before Ilenry, J., at Chambers in New HaNOVEE county, on the — day of December, 1875. The defendants moved the court to increase the amount of a bond for an injunction theretofore granted. The motion was allowed, and the plaintiffs appealed. All the facts necessary to an understanding of the case as decided, are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

EyNüm, J.

There is error. Judge Seymoue granted the restraining order, requiring a bond of $5,000 for the indemnity of the defendants. The restraining order was afterwards vacated by Judge McKay, and the plaintiffs appealed to the Supremo Court, from the vacating order, gave the appeal bond, and the case -was stated and signed by the counsel of both parties. Some two weeks after this, an affidavit was tiled by one of the commissioners, stating no new facts, and not alleging the insufficiency of the bond. Upon a motion founded on that affidavit, Judge HeNey then holding court in Judge McKay’s…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Green v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Pasour v. . LinebergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Pruett v. Charlotte Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Wilson v. . SeagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Bohannon v. Virginia Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API