Legal Opinion

Loftfield v. Ferreira

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 29, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In June of 2003, a default judgment entered against Loftfield in a summary process action in the District Court. Loftfield claims that when he attempted to file a timely notice of appeal, a clerk in the District Court refused to accept it. Although Loftfield’s notice of appeal allegedly was accepted for filing two days later, he claims that the clerk subsequently informed him that his notice would not be docketed because it was untimely. In Loftfield’s G. L. c. 211, § 3, petition, he sought relief mainly from the clerk’s alleged refusal to docket his notice of appeal.2

The case is now before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gorod v. TabachnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Lu v. Boston Division of the Housing Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Morales v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Watson v. Clerk-Magistrate of District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Strahan v. Superior Court Department of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API