Taylor v. Littell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
from the District Court, parish of St. Landry. Bailey, J.
1Opinion of the CourtIIowe, J.
The defendants have appealed from a judgment by
default on a promissory note,,and have presented a number of points lor our consideration. They urge that the petition does not state the residence of tho plaintiff nor her full mame. This objection (il not entirely frivolous), should have been pleaded in limine, by dilatory exception. Parmely v. Bradbury, 13 La. 353.
They also object that plaintiff docs not appear to have been properly authorised to prosecute the action, hut this defense should also have been specially pleaded in tho court below. Cochrane v. Miller, 10 Ann. 140.
They further…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Milliken & Farwell v. Taft Mercantile Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Vince v. BurnsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939