Legal Opinion
Nadeau v. Matesanz
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 30, 2002No. 01-2288PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellant Richard Nadeau appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. In March 1996, a Middlesex Superior Court jury convicted Nadeau of two counts of burglary, three counts of receiving stolen property, and one count of receiving a stolen motor vehicle. Appealing his convictions, Nadeau argued inter alia that he could not lawfully be convicted of both the burglary and the receiving of the stolen property. On April 2, 1999, the Massachusetts Appeals Court agreed with Nadeau’s argument and vacated the possession of stolen…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. GaddisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commonwealth v. NascimentoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- United States v. Vincent Edward BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Francis v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Saint Fort v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Smiley v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Mello v. DiPaoloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Campiti v. MatesanzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.