Legal Opinion

Prairie Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Kittrell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 31, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court; Daniel Hon, Judge;

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Appellant gave a supersedeas bond, and the judgment was affirmed. Prairie Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Kittrell, 106 Ark. 138.

The surety on the supersedeas bond now moves this court for summary judgment against appellant, alleging that the amount of the affirmed judgment has been paid by said surety.

The question arises whether or not this court has authority to render such judgment.

The only statute which in express terms authorizes this court to render summary judgment on a supersedeas bond only provides for judgment against the sureties. Kirby’s Digest, § 1235.

The statute now relied…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prairie Creek Coal Mining Co. v. KittrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Milor v. FarrellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1869

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MartineauSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Cook v. Cramer Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. Thornbrough v. MaynerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API