Legal Opinion
Mickle v. Kirk
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 1991No. 49A04-8907-CV-304PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
CONOVER, Judge.
We address one issue raised by Kirk in her petition for rehearing and accordingly, modify our previous opinion. In our original opinion, we awarded Mickle the value of the breezeway as an improvement and remanded the matter back to the trial court to determine its value. 558 N.E.2d 1119. In her petition for rehearing, Kirk calls to our attention the fact Mickle did not construct the breezeway improvement until after his right to possession was put in issue. In support of her position, Kirk relies on Richwine v. The Presbyterian Church of Noblesville…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Richwine v. Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Mickle v. KirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- Penn Central Corporation v. U.S. Railroad Vest Corporation Beverly D. Crone, Auditor of St. Joseph CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Larkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Penn Central Corp. v. U.S. Railroad Vest, Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993