Legal Opinion

Jaster v. Schmidt (In Re Schmidt)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada

Decided September 27, 1995No. 03-14667PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING JURY TRIAL

LINDA B. RIEGLE, Chief Judge.

The Debtor/Defendant, Robert G. Schmidt (“Schmidt”) has filed a demand for a jury trial in an adversary action filed by creditor Kirk Jaster (“Jaster”).

Jaster’s complaint seeks to revoke Schmidt’s discharge under § 727(d) on the stated ground that Schmidt knowingly and fraudulently concealed an ownership interest in “Hytech Environmental Services, Inc.” Schmidt demands a jury trial upon the stated grounds that “the crux of the complaint is that the Defendant engaged in fraud.” (Defendant’s Brief, p. 3, lines 5-6). “The issue of whether the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Schieber v. Hooper (In Re Hooper)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Nassau Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Trinsey (In Re Trinsey)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Rude v. Whitehorn (In Re Whitehorn)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clippard v. Russell (In Re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2008
  2. Tomey v. Dizinno (In re Dizinno)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Seller v. Parks (In Re Parks)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API