Legal Opinion
CITY OF TULSA v. HODGE
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 11, 2018No. 113,571PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDSON, J.:
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 1 In 2010 the Workers' Compensation Court held that Ms. Hodge sustained an accidental injury on September 15, 2008 in the course of her employment. The trial court awarded her benefits for injuries to the left leg (knee), cervical spine, left shoulder, and whole body. The matter currently before this Court arises out of a subsequent claim filed by Ms. Hodge seeking additional benefits alleging she suffered a change of condition for the worse to the left leg (knee), cervical spine, left shoulder and whole body.
¶ 2 On February 20, 2012 Ms. Hodge was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams Companies v. DunkelgodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Barnsdall Refining Co. v. RamsdallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Phillips v. Duke Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- CITY OF TULSA v. HODGESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018