Legal Opinion

Hamman v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 22, 1980No. CR 80-134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant seeks a belated appeal. On August 18, 1977, after a jury found him guilty of burglary and theft of property in violation of Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 41-2002 and 41-2203 (Repl. 1977), he was duly committed to the Department of Correction to serve sentences of four years and one year, respectively, the sentences to run concurrently. On August 8, 1979, nearly two years later, appellant filed a pro se Rule 37 petition for postconviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. On October 4, 1979, appointed counsel filed an additional petition requesting that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Finnie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sampson Ellis v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  2. Gray v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API