Legal Opinion

Lefemine v. Wideman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 5, 2012No. 12-168PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Per curiam

This case concerns the award of attorney’s fees in a suit alleging unconstitutional conduct by government officials. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that a plaintiff who secured a permanent injunction but no monetary damages was not a “prevailing party” under 42 U. S. C. § 1988, and so could not receive fees. That was error. Because the injunction ordered the defendant officials to change their behavior in a way that directly benefited the plaintiff, we vacate the Fourth Circuit’s decision and remand for further proceedings.

Petitioner Steven Lefemine and members…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Rhodes v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Steven Lefemine v. Dan WidemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  5. Lefemine v. DavisDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2010

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Floyd Hardrick v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. Lackey v. StinnieSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
  3. Daniel Tumpson v. James Farina (072813)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  4. Demetrius Hill v. C.O. CrumCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  5. Center for Bio Diversity v. EPACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API