Lefemine v. Wideman
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
This case concerns the award of attorney’s fees in a suit alleging unconstitutional conduct by government officials. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that a plaintiff who secured a permanent injunction but no monetary damages was not a “prevailing party” under 42 U. S. C. § 1988, and so could not receive fees. That was error. Because the injunction ordered the defendant officials to change their behavior in a way that directly benefited the plaintiff, we vacate the Fourth Circuit’s decision and remand for further proceedings.
Petitioner Steven Lefemine and members…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rhodes v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Steven Lefemine v. Dan WidemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Lefemine v. DavisDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2010
3Cited by152 opinions
- Floyd Hardrick v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Lackey v. StinnieSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
- Daniel Tumpson v. James Farina (072813)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- Demetrius Hill v. C.O. CrumCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Center for Bio Diversity v. EPACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.