Alpex Computer Corp. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Alpex Computer Corporation (“Alpex”) moves for an order pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 408 precluding defendants Nintendo Company, Ltd. and Nintendo of America (“Nintendo”) from introducing any evidence concerning plaintiffs efforts to compromise disputed claims regarding the ’555 patent and the amounts involved in those efforts to compromise. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants plaintiff’s motion.
Background
This case arises from a dispute over the validity and alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,026,555 (the ’555 patent), a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Trebor Sportswear Co., Inc. And Rotano Sportswear Co., Inc., Plaintiffs v. The Limited Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Big O Tire Dealers, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ramada Development Company v. Martin W. Rauch, Defendants-Third Party J. Stewart Stein, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Deere & Company, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. International Harvester Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Affiliated Manufacturers, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Eskofot A/S v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Wechsler v. Hunt Health Systems, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In Re Mahurkar Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Patent LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.