Legal Opinion
Modica v. Topaz Enterprises, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 22, 2017No. 2014-11904PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to enforce a settlement agreement, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Nahman, J.), entered October 22, 2014, as granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff 106-09 Rockaway Owners Corp. (hereinafter 106-09) owned real property located at 106-09 Rockaway Boulevard in Queens until a mortgage and note on the property was foreclosed on by Eastern Savings Bank, FSB…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Cornell v. T. V. Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- DeCapua v. Dine-A-Mate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Elite Promotional Marketing, Inc. v. StumacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- First Frontier Pro Rodeo Circuit Finals, LLC v. PRCA First Frontier CircuitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Loughlin v. MeghjiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020