Rockow v. Hendry
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
Appellant Rockow, plaintiff below, filed his amended complaint in the lower Court alleging that appellee-defendant Hendry’s cattle crossed the boundaries of Rockow’s land and destroyed part of his pepper crop. In count 2 Rockow alleged that Hendry’s cattle had crossed over onto his property on numerous occasions and destroyed part of his crop; that peppers are still growing thereon; and that he is without legal remedy save by injunction. Rockow prayed for a temporary and permanent injunction against Hendry. He did not allege that his land was fenced or otherwise enclosed.
Upon…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Dutton Phosphate Co. v. PriestSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
- Blood v. HuntSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Hart v. BostwickSupreme Court of Florida · 1872
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. GeigerSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hendry v. RockowSupreme Court of Florida · 1970