Legal Opinion
Carlson v. Astrue
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 21, 2010No. Civil No. 08-1202-STPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAGGERTY, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Stewart referred to this court a Findings and Recommendation [21] in this matter. The Findings and Recommendation recommends remanding this matter for payment of benefits. Defendant has filed objections. For the reasons provided, this court adopts the Findings and Recommendation.
STANDARDS
When a party objects to any portion of a Findings and Recommendation, the district court must conduct a de novo review. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach. Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981). This court has performed a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Berke v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2020
- Dillard v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- Kava v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021