Legal Opinion

Strong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 1932No. A-8215PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Canadian county of the larceny of an automobile, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of five years.

Defendant in his brief says:

“We wish to urge for a reversal of this case our second and third assignments of error:
“Second. The court erred in overruling the petitioner’s objection to going to trial for the reason that the issues in this case had not been joined until the 19th day of January, 1981, and the petitioner was forced to trial on the 21st day…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lumpkin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Newcomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Klaber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Merriott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Bouie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Brumley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API