Legal Opinion
Haron v. Board of Ed. of City of New York
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 31, 1976No. 75 Civ 1120PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
Defendants move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that plaintiff’s complaint “fails to state a cause of action”.
Technically, such a motion would lie under Rule 12(b)(6) and would seek an order of dismissal for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted”, but in view of the fact that defendants have filed an answer and an affidavit and a statement under Rule 9(g) of the General Rules of this Court in support of the motion, the motion will be treated as one for summary judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- John F. Lombard v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, and John A. Murphy,defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Russell v. HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Elliott H. Velger v. Donald F. Cawley, Police Commissioner, City of New York,defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Orshan v. AnkerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Capers v. Long Island RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Kattar v. Three Rivers Area Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1999
- Lombard v. Board of Education of City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Summers v. CivisDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.