State ex rel. Broughton Hospital v. Hollifield
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Defendant’s first contention is that a State institution, such as hospital, may institute a civil action for treatment and maintenance only during the period of time when the patient is actually receiving such treatment and maintenance. It is argued that once a patient leaves the State institution, the action for treatment and maintenance may be instituted only after the patient’s death. In support of this position, defendant relies upon G.S. 143-121, which provides:
“Action to recover costs. — Immediately upon the fixing of the amount of such actual costs, as herein provided, a cause of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State State Hospital at Raleigh v. Security National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Read v. . TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Dorothea Dix Hospital v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975