Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Broughton Hospital v. Hollifield

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1969No. 6929SC136PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Defendant’s first contention is that a State institution, such as hospital, may institute a civil action for treatment and maintenance only during the period of time when the patient is actually receiving such treatment and maintenance. It is argued that once a patient leaves the State institution, the action for treatment and maintenance may be instituted only after the patient’s death. In support of this position, defendant relies upon G.S. 143-121, which provides:

“Action to recover costs. — Immediately upon the fixing of the amount of such actual costs, as herein provided, a cause of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State State Hospital at Raleigh v. Security National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Read v. . TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Dorothea Dix Hospital v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API