Bill v. FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentLarson, J.
(dissenting) — Although it seems a futile gesture, I feel compelled to dissent, especially in light of the fact *1228that, in order to reverse, the majority admittedly overrule two well established rules of long standing in this court. The situation certainly is not one which, in the interest of justice, makes a change necessary or desirable. Those rules do not cause a wrongful result here, and plaintiffs should not be denied a deserved judgment in their favor. The majority hold, and I agree, that there was ample evidence to require submission of this case to the jury. Its verdict is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Agen v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Stephenson v. Bankers Life Ass'n of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- In Re Lundvall's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Reddick v. Grand Union Tea Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.