Legal Opinion

State v. Rhinehart

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1984No. 8330SC1124PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant contends the court erred in denying him the opportunity to cross-examine the complainant regarding her prior sexual conduct with her former boyfriend on the night of the alleged rape and sexual offense. Evidence adduced at an in camera hearing pursuant to G.S. 8-58.6 established that earlier in the evening of the alleged offenses the victim had driven her former boyfriend, whom she had dated for four years, from a night spot to his home, and that she had engaged in sexual intercourse with him while there. The court ruled, following the hearing, that the complainant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. FortneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. McElveen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. State v. YoungerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Hodges v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JenningsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  2. State v. GinyardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API