Legal Opinion

Wyant v. Crouse

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1901PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Cass; Smith, J. Case by William B. Wyant and Judith A. Wyant against George Crouse to recover damages for the destruction of property by fire. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiffs commenced an action by ■declaration against the defendant to recover damages for the destruction of a blacksmith shop and other property by fire. The declaration stated that he wrongfully broke into the shop, and started a fire in the forge, and the undisputed proof shows that he did so. The declaration purports to be in case, and, after alleging the wrongful entry and building of a fire, alleges negligence in managing it, and a consequent fire a short time after defendant left the shop. It seems to be conceded that, if this was to be treated as a count in trespass quare…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Chandler v. AllisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Haines v. BeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Ives v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Wood v. Michigan Air Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kopka v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Ky. Heating Co. v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Hartford Accident and Indemnity v. Norbert J. Krekeler and Krekeler Supermarket, Inc., D/B/A Indian Hills Tom Boy, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  4. Glaser v. Hackensack Water Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Allstate Fire Ins. v. SinglerOhio Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API