Legal Opinion

Overstreet v. Overstreet

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 14, 2015No. 2131053PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

Joseph. T. Overstreet (“the husband”) appeals from an order of the Clarke Circuit Court (“the trial court”) reducing the husband’s periodic-alimony obligation to Tammy Mauldin Overstreet (“the wife”). On December 29, 2010, the trial court en~ tered a judgment divorcing the parties. That judgment ordered the husband to, among other things, pay $500 per month in child support for.the parties’ minor child, L.H.O. (“the child”),1 to be payable through the child’s 19th birthday; maintain health insurance on the child;2 pay half of the child’s college expenses each year,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nunn v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Hamilton Ex Rel. Slate-Hamilton v. ConnallySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Wellborn v. WellbornCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hughes v. HughesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API