Legal Opinion

State v. Hammond

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 14, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of Minneapolis, after a conviction under the ordinance recited in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

The charter of the city of Minneapolis provides (Sp. Laws 1881, c. 76, sube. 4, § 5) that “the city council shall have full power and authority to make, ordain, publish, enforce, alter, amend, or repeal all such ordinances for the government and good order of the city, for the suppression of vice and intemperance, and for the prevention of crime, as it shall deem expedient; * * * and for these purposes the said city council shall have authority, by such ordinances, * * * sixteenth, to prevent open or notorious drunkenness and obscenity in the streets or public places of said city.” The…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SugarmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. City of St. Louis v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. State ex rel. Zien v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. City of Virginia v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Green v. Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API