Legal Opinion

State v. Schatz

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided August 26, 1987No. 86-1000PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONIELSON, Judge.

The State of Iowa appeals from the order granting a new trial to the defendant in a prosecution for second-degree sexual abuse, asserting that undisclosed exculpatory evidence was not material in a manner warranting a new trial. We reverse.

On January 22, 1986, the defendant, William C. Schatz, was charged by Dallas County Attorney’s information with sexual abuse in the second degree, in violation of Iowa Code sections 709.1 and 709.3 (1985). The information alleged that Schatz sexually abused a child under the age of twelve. The jury found Schatz guilty as charged. At trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. State v. HalsteadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  5. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brewer v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  2. Luke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
  3. Stan T. Fenske v. John ThalackerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. State v. JordenCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
  5. State v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API