Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dawes v. Murphy

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1963No. 7360Published

1DissentBryant, J.

The question before the court at this time arises under a motion filed by the Inland Mortgage Corporation, defendant-appellee, to dismiss the appeal on questions of law and fact filed by Bobert L. Murphy and Gladys L. Murphy, defendants-appellants.

On behalf of the Inland Mortgage Corporation, hereinafter called Inland, it is contended that “because this case is an action at law and such appeal is improper in such action,” the appeal on questions of law and fact should be dismissed. Counsel for Inland cite the decisions of the Supreme Court of Ohio in the cases of Borton v. Earhart (1945), 144…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nordin v. CoultonOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Borton v. EarhartOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hebden v. HebdenOhio Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API