Legal Opinion

Brooklyn City Railroad v. City of New York

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 20, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event. The notice of claim bore the stamped signature of the officer of the claimant and of the notary public. The court declined to receive it in evidence on the ground that it was not verified, unless it bore the autograph signatures of the claimant and of the notary. The notice of claim states that it was verified by the claimant. There is no proof to the contrary. The fact that the signatures were stamped did not establish that the claim was unverified. Generally, a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. David v. . Williamsburgh City Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sandymark Realty Corp. v. CreswellCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  2. People v. MercadoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1984
  3. In re the Estate of RomaniwNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. People v. McIverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. Fazal Realty Corp. v. PazCivil Court of the City of New York · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API