State v. Hecht
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtVerellen, J.
¶ 1 A prosecutor improperly appeals to the passion and prejudice of a jury by using graphics in closing argument that show the defendant’s face with the word “GUILTY” superimposed in red.1 Michael Hecht was convicted of felony harassment and patronizing a prostitute. During closing argument, the prosecutor used multiple slides showing Hecht’s photograph with a large red “GUILTY” superimposed over his face. There is no legitimate purpose for such images in a criminal trial. Such *501misconduct was flagrant and ill intentioned, and the prejudicial impact could not have been cured by a jury…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- In re the Personal Restraint of GlasmannWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. LoughWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MondayWashington Supreme Court · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Washington v. Haven Mary ScabbyrobeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Personal Restraint Petition Of: Jay Earl MckagueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State Of Washington v. David ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Donald W. BangoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Encarnacion Salas, IvCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.