Legal Opinion

State v. Hecht

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 18, 2014No. 71059-1-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVerellen, J.

¶ 1 A prosecutor improperly appeals to the passion and prejudice of a jury by using graphics in closing argument that show the defendant’s face with the word “GUILTY” superimposed in red.1 Michael Hecht was convicted of felony harassment and patronizing a prostitute. During closing argument, the prosecutor used multiple slides showing Hecht’s photograph with a large red “GUILTY” superimposed over his face. There is no legitimate purpose for such images in a criminal trial. Such *501misconduct was flagrant and ill intentioned, and the prejudicial impact could not have been cured by a jury…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of GlasmannWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. LoughWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. MondayWashington Supreme Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State of Washington v. Haven Mary ScabbyrobeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  2. Personal Restraint Petition Of: Jay Earl MckagueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. State Of Washington v. David ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. State Of Washington v. Donald W. BangoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. State Of Washington v. Encarnacion Salas, IvCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API