Legal Opinion

Staner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 26, 1938No. 19842Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON motion for rehearing.

Morrow, Presiding Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant contends that he was entitled to have the jury instructed in the language of his Requested Charge No. 5 as follows: “You are instructed that you will not discuss or refer to in this case, the fact that the defendant has not testified as the law will not permit such discussion or reference thereto.”

There is nothing in the record to show that the requested instruction was submitted to the court before he gave his main charge to the jury.

We quote from 4 Tex. Jur'., p. 78, Section 49, as follows: “In order that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API