Legal Opinion
Boland v. Wasco, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 17, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0739PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Re Document No.: 17
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
When a pension fund determines that ari' employer has withdrawn from a multiem-ployer pension plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and notifies the employer accordingly, the employer is obligated to make withdrawal liability payments to the fund. Even when withdrawal liability is disputed, the employer must make interim payments under a “pay now, dispute later” rule. In this action, a pension fund’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hartman v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cory v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund v. Wasco, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
- Marine Carpenters Pension Fund v. Puglia Marine, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Aminjavaheri v. BidenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust v. XYZ Corporations and/or Individuals 1-10District Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Gjoci v. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.