Legal Opinion

People v. Richmond

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Van Burén. (Mills, J.) Complaint for keeping bar open contrary to statute. Respondent brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The respondent was charged before a justice of the peace with not keeping a room in which liquors were sold, closed between the hours of nine and ten o’clock at night. He was arrested and brought before the justice, when he pleaded guilty to the complaint. He does not appear to have been represented by attorney or counsel on that occasion. The justice imposed the least penalty provided by statute for such offense, and respondent thereupon appealed to the circuit court.

The statute giving justices of the peace jurisdiction in criminal cases provides: “If the accused shall plead guilty to such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. MahoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. State v. PrickettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Thomas v. Montcalm Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Pueblo v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. Territory v. SnyderHawaii Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API