Legal Opinion

Dunnick v. Hagedorn

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 11, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■Evans, J.

I. This case is closely related to that of Hagedorn v. Hagedorn, 194 Iowa 172, recently decided by us. The same transaction of sale of land is involved in both cases. In the cited case, the defendant herein was the plaintiff, and as such had brought a quieting-title suit against the alleged purchaser. The defendant in that ease set up a claim of contract of purchase, and tendered performance, and prayed for specific performance. Final decree in that case established the contract, notwithstanding the plea of the statute of frauds interposed by the plaintiff. In the case at bar, this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Poole, Gilliam & Co. v. SeneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Scott v. Mundy & ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Hagedorn v. HagedornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fairall v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. Bennett v. Monticello State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Redenbaugh v. DanielsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API