Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Buchanan

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action for replevin and damages, tried without a jury by consent.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

Briefly stated, the action is to replevy a corpse and, in effect, is instituted by the widow of the deceased against his brother, the party who caused the interment of his remains.

Presumably, the interment was decent and fitting, for it is not otherwise alleged, and the widow’s grievance is substantially that the defendant’s exercise of dominion over the corpse, for burial, was in hostility to her right to choose her husband’s place of sepulture.

While it has been generally stated that there can be no right of property in a dead body still it is recognized that there exists a personal right in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foley v. PhelpsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re RichardsonNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  2. In re the Estate of ScheckNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  3. Curlin v. CurlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Stiles v. StilesNew York Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Danahy v. KelloggNew York Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API