Legal Opinion

Turnipseed Et Ux. v. Brown

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 27, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBueord, C. J.

— Appellee filed bill to reform a deed to con form to the intention of the parties at the time the deed was made, so as to exclude certain lands which appeared to have been included in the deed by mistake.

Answer was filed by the appellant.

The Bill and answer clearly presented issues of fact.

Testimony was taken before the chancellor and the decree from which appeal is taken was in favor of the complainant below.

There is ample substantial evidence disclosed by the transcript of the record to support the decree.

"Questions of fact only are presented by the assignments of error. There is ample…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carr v. LesleySupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Cobb v. CobbSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  3. Hennessy v. HudsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co. v. KirklandSupreme Court of Florida · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. GoertnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. McEwen Et Ux. v. Growers Loan Guar. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Maxwell v. Smith, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Galloway, Et Ux. v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API