State v. Mackor
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The defendant appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70. The defendant claims that the statute is vague and viola*317tive of due process. He also claims that the court erred in failing to charge the jury on all of the elements of the crime, in referring only to testimony introduced by the state during its charge to the jury, and in allowing the introduction of evidence of the presence of spermatozoa in a vaginal swab obtained from the victim.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. The victim,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. DeMatteoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. BabyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- State v. SieringConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. McKnightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- State v. CorbinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.