Legal Opinion

Ford v. . Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 27, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Civil action- to recover a debt, tried before Lyon, J., at November Term, 1917, of Fbawklin. . From a judgment of nonsuit plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBeown, J.

This action is brought to recover $592.99 for money, supplies, and a horse alleged to have been furnished to defendant and his son, John D. Moore. At the close of the evidence, the court, being of opinion that there is no evidence that the credit was extended to defendant, or that he was the original promissor, and the contract not being in writing, sustained a motion to nonsuit.

There is evidence that in the beginning of the year 1914 this defend-' ant went to plaintiff, a merchant engaged in the mercantile and livestock business, and made a contract with plaintiff for advances for him self…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peele v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Morrison v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Sheppard v. Newton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Worthington v. . JollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Balentine v. . GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Vanderbilt Tire & Rubber Corp. v. BowenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API