Hawkins v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia

This case was here on a former appeal. See Hawkins v. Land Bank, 221 N. C., 73, 18 S. E. (2d), 823, where the essential facts are stated. This appeal should have been docketed at the Spring Term. Rule 5, 221 N. C., 546. Be that as it may, the jury has decided the controverted facts in favor of the defendant. The exceptive assignments of error relied upon by the plaintiffs are without substantial merit. The judgment entered must be sustained.

No error.