Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Manuel v. Soileau

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1974No. 4781Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCulpepper, Judge

I concur in that part of the majority opinion which rejects defendant’s recon-ventional demand for damages. However, *836I dissent from the holding that plaintiff is not entitled to recover past due rent in the sum of $3,050 which was proved but was not prayed for.

On March 23, 1973, plaintiff leased to defendant the Tournoi Motel and Lounge for a term of one year and at a monthly rental of $750, payable in advance on the first of each month. On June 30, 1973, plaintiff filed suit to cancel the lease on the grounds that defendant had failed to pay the utility bills as agreed upon in the lease. She…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Austrum v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. TalbertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. TalbertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API