Legal Opinion

Klosterman v. City of Elkton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1928No. File No. 5634PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C.

Plaintiffs, respondents herein, petitioned, in compliance with section 6555, Rev. Code 1919, to have their lands excluded from the limits of the city of Elkton. These lands consist of 159 acres in the southwest corner of the city. Upon the failure of the governing "body of such city to grant the request, respondents instituted proceedings in circuit court. The circuit court rendered judgment excluding said lands. The city appealed; and upon appeal, the judgment of the circuit court excluding the lands was reversed. 46 S. D. 136, 191 N. W. 341. At 191 N. W. 342, a plat of the entire…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. State ex inf. Major v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. Forbes v. City of MeridianMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Christ v. City of Webster CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. City Council of Alexandria v. Alexandria CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zajicek v. City of WessingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Kel-Kan Inv. Corp. v. Village of GreenwoodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Snow v. South Shore Independent School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Knutson v. City of CentervilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Neeman v. Town of ChancellorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API