State v. Hoyt
Supreme Court of Vermont
Indictment under V. S. c. 198 for becoming a peddler without a license. At the June term, 1898, Orange county, Start, J., presiding, the demurrer to the indictment was overruled, pro forma, and the indictment and each count thereof adjudged sufficient. The respondent excepted.
1Opinion of the CourtRoweel, J.
The respondent is indicted for becoming a peddler without a license.
The statute on which the indictment is founded provides, that a person going from town to town or from place to place in a town, carrying to sell, or exposing for sale, goods composed in whole or in part of cotton, linen, woolen or silk, plated or gilded ware, jewelry, patent medicine, or a compound medicine the composition of which is kept secret from the public, watches or clocks, which are the manufacture of this State; and a person who transports such goods, wares or merchandise from town to .town, or who comes from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Colgate v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Commonwealth v. HanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Woco Pep Co. of Montgomery v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- State v. Clement National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.