Legal Opinion

Boykin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 18, 1999No. A99A1676PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Following the denial of her motion for new trial, Retha Boykin appeals her conviction of the burglary of a Macy’s department store. She raises three issues for us to decide. First, she charges her trial counsel with ineffective assistance in allowing the prosecutor to question the arresting officer concerning her post-arrest silence. Second, she claims counsel was ineffective in not informing her of the impact of sentencing under the recidivist act. Third, she challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Because we hold that her counsel was not ineffective and that the evidence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Mallory v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  4. Landers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Turpin v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mullinax v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Swantner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Gordon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API