Legal Opinion

Cruz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1925No. 8711PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Gonzales County of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at three years in the penitentiary.

There are but two bills of exception, one taken to the refusal of a continuance applied for before the trial actually began, and the other applied for while the trial was in progress. Bach is sought because of the absence of the same witnesses, to-wit: Jesus Hunos and Agroda Garcia.

The application states conclusions. It is not accompanied either by the application for process, or the process which is alleged…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Giles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Bronson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Singleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Bost v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Pilgrim v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wiley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Tubb, Sr. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Escobar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Tubb, Sr. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API