Legal Opinion

Bright v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 7, 1911No. 3323PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Indictment for larceny; from city court of Albany — Judge Crosland.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The only question raised by the bill of exceptions is the sufficiency of the indictment, under which the defendant was tried and convicted, as against the special demurrer filed thereto. The material portions of the indictment are as follows: “On the *1819th day of October in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and ten, in the county aforesaid, of the personal goods of W. T. Lockett then and there being found, to wit, 100 pounds of seed cotton, of the value of $10.” "The defendant demurred, on the ground that the property alleged to have been stolen was not described with sufficient…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ayers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Melvin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ellis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  2. Pharr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Streeter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. State v. TraylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API