Legal Opinion

Distaff, Incorporated v. Springfield Contracting Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 27, 1993No. 92-1302PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge:

On June 4, 1988, a fire occurred at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C. Distaff, which suffered damage as a result of the fire, was a contractor engaged in asbestos abatement in the building in which the fire occurred. Distaff appeals the district court’s order excluding from evidence a governmental investigative report which indicated that equipment supplied by Springfield caused the fire. Distaff also appeals the district court’s order restricting Distaff’s causes of action to a negligence theory of recovery. Springfield argues against the above…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Jefferey Dale Ellis, Administrator of the Estate of Margaret Ann Ellis, Deceased v. International Playtex, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  2. Rhodes v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  3. Lohrenz v. DonnellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  4. Comsat Corp. v. National Science FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Jamie Meyers v. Michael LamerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API