Girardi v. Girardi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*487The Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the plaintiff the aggregate sum of $210 per week as temporary maintenance and child support. Due consideration was given to the needs of the plaintiff and the children and the defendant’s financial ability to provide for those needs (see, Richards v Richards, 130 AD2d 642; Stern v Stern, 106 AD2d 631; Van Ess v Van Ess, 100 AD2d 848).
We further find, based upon the financial information submitted thus far, that the Supreme Court did not err in requiring that the defendant pay for certain expenses associated with the upkeep of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Van Ess v. Van EssAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Stern v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Chosed v. ChosedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Mahler v. MahlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Schlosberg v. SchlosbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nicholas v. NicholasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- Krantz v. KrantzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Knickerbocker v. CannonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Meyer v. MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Vest v. VestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.