Legal Opinion

Chicago Limousine Service, Inc. v. Hartigan Cadillac, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 21, 1989No. 1-87-2876, 1-87-3279 consPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

This appeal involves a commercial dispute between a secured inventory lender and a rescinding purchaser, following default by a third-party borrower. Chicago Limousine Service, Inc. (CLS), brought a replevin action against Hartigan Cadillac, Inc. (Dealership),1 and General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC), the secured inventory lender of the Dealership, seeking possession of two 1985 Cadillac limousines. After a six-day bench trial, the circuit court awarded possession of the vehicles,2 damages, and costs to CLS, and dismissed GMAC’s affirmative defenses and counterclaim.

On appeal, GMAC…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stowers v. MahonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. CENTRAL NAT'L BK. OF MATTOON v. Worden-Martin, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Tidwell Industries, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Massey-Ferguson, Inc. v. HellandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. International Harvester Credit Corp. v. HellandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mor-Wood Contractors, Inc. v. OttingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Chicago Limousine Service, Inc. v. Hartigan Cadillac, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hoc, Inc. v. McAllisterDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
  4. HOC, Inc. v. McAllister (In re McAllister)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
  5. In Re McAllisterDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API