Legal Opinion
City of Emory v. Lusk
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)
Decided January 30, 2009No. 12-08-00059-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice.
The City of Emory appeals a trial court judgment embodying a jury’s $10,000.00 award to Scott and Lisa Lusk as damages for a sewer easement taken by the City through inverse condemnation. In six issues, the City contends the judgment should be reversed because the Lusks consented to the taking, waived their right to seek damages, and failed to present evidence sufficient to support the award of damages. Contending the City is not im mune from suit, the Lusks appeal from a partial summary judgment granted in favor of the City on the Lusks’ breach of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. JustissTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- East Houston Estate Apartments, L.L.C. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
- City of San Antonio, Acting Through City Public Service Board of San Antonio v. Wheelabrator Air Pollution Control, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
- Christopher L. Gay and Steven L. Carroll v. the City of Wichita Falls, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014
- City of El Paso, Texas v. High Ridge Construction, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.