Legal Opinion

Moshassuck Encampment, No. 2 v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 18, 1903Published

Assumpsit.

1Per curiam

The court is of opinion that the rulings of Mr. Justice Douglas were correct, and adopt his decision as the opinion of the court.

Decision.

Douglas, J.(1) The plaintiffs in this case were owners of a building standing on leased land. Their lease expired June 30, 1899, but contained a clause providing that they should give up possession when the value of the building, to be decided by arbitration, should be paid them by the lessors. The defendants were tenants of a part of the building by lease from the plaintiffs, which expired June 30, 1899. On October 9, 1899, the plaintiffs were paid the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Rensselaer's Heirs v. PennimanNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Ecke v. FetzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Holsman v. AbramsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
  4. Franklin Land, Mill & Water Co. v. CardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API