Legal Opinion

Kirtland v. Parker

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 24, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Voorhebs, J.

This unit brings under review an assessment for benefits against the prosecutor’s lot, situate on the corner of Hardenbergh and Somerset streets, in the city of New Brunswick, for laying a pavement in Hardenbergh street, adjoining said property. The lot in question is one hundred and fifty feet on Hardenbergh street and twenty-eight feet on Somerset street, and contains a dwelling-house covering practically one hundred feet of the lot.

The return shows that the assessment in question, amounting to $543.50, was made by the. street…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Katyuga v. CosgroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  2. State v. Mayor of RutherfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  3. State v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  4. Tusting v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Manufacturers' Land & Improvement Co. v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  2. Walker v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Walker v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API