Collins v. Levine
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Judge.
The appellant here is the plaintiff in a suit below against a law firm and an attorney, wherein she alleged that defendants are indebted to her for neglect of professional duties. The appellee, the firm of Parks & Eisenberg, was granted summary judgment on grounds that there was at no time any privity of contract between plaintiff Collins and defendant Parks & Eisenberg but rather that at all times the attorney-client contract and relationship existed only between plaintiff and defendant Levine; that Parks & Eisenberg did not represent, plaintiff in the action in question and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Fitzgerald Cotton Oil Co. v. Farmers Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Combs v. ADAIR MORTGAGE COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Feltman v. National Bank of Ga.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Fleming v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reese v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Reese v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Turner v. Clark & ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981