Legal Opinion

Collins v. Levine

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 19, 1980No. 60319PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Judge.

The appellant here is the plaintiff in a suit below against a law firm and an attorney, wherein she alleged that defendants are indebted to her for neglect of professional duties. The appellee, the firm of Parks & Eisenberg, was granted summary judgment on grounds that there was at no time any privity of contract between plaintiff Collins and defendant Parks & Eisenberg but rather that at all times the attorney-client contract and relationship existed only between plaintiff and defendant Levine; that Parks & Eisenberg did not represent, plaintiff in the action in question and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Fitzgerald Cotton Oil Co. v. Farmers Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Combs v. ADAIR MORTGAGE COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Feltman v. National Bank of Ga.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Fleming v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reese v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Reese v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Turner v. Clark & ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API