Legal Opinion

People v. Rolon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 10, 1995PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kriendler, J.), imposed March 30, 1994.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

As the record indicates that the defendant was incorrectly informed that he was not entitled to appellate review of his sentence on the ground that it was excessive, his purported waiver of his right to appeal cannot be considered knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see generally, People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 282-283). We have examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. KazepisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. HurdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. People v. DeBoueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. People v. BorgwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. People v. Caleb C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API